Publications

Refine Results

(Filters Applied) Clear All

Setting values for TDWR/LLWAS 3 integration parameters

Author:
Published in:
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Report ATC-195

Summary

In 1993 the FAA will begin deploying the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) at selected airports in the United States. Forty-five TDWRs will be collocated with LLWAS 3 systems, and the FAA has decided that all TDWRs collocated with LLWAS 3 systems must be integrated with LLWAS 3 prior to commissioning. The algorithm chosen to perform this integration must be supplied with a set of site-specific parameters. This report gives guidance on how to set the values of theme integration parameters.
READ LESS

Summary

In 1993 the FAA will begin deploying the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) at selected airports in the United States. Forty-five TDWRs will be collocated with LLWAS 3 systems, and the FAA has decided that all TDWRs collocated with LLWAS 3 systems must be integrated with LLWAS 3 prior to...

READ MORE

A comparison of anemometer and Doppler radar winds during wind shear events

Published in:
16th Conf. on Severe Local Storms/Conf. on Atmospheric Electricity, 22-26 October 1990, pp. 356-361.

Summary

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) currently uses the anemometer-based Low Level Wind Shear Alert System (LLWAS) as the primary method of wind shear detection at major U.S. airports. With the upcoming deployment of the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) system, potential methods for integrating the two systems are being investigated. By integrating, advantages of both sensor systems can be utilized. Advantages of the LLWAS ground sensor network include true wind direction measurements, a high measurement frequency, a lack of sensitivity to clear air reflectivity, and few false alarms from radar point targets such as planes, birds, etc. Advantages of the radar include complete scan coverage of the region of concern, the ability to predict events, fewer terrain problems such as sheltering which can reduce the wind speed readings, and almost no false alarms due to non-hazardous wind shear such as thermals. The objectives of this study are to gain a clearer understanding of the basic relationship between the wind information provided by these two very different sensing systems, and to determine the impact this relationship may have on integration of the two operational systems. A proposed mathematical technique for "correcting" LLWAS winds where needed to better match radar winds is evaluated for cases of microburst (divergent) and gust front (convergent) wind shear.
READ LESS

Summary

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) currently uses the anemometer-based Low Level Wind Shear Alert System (LLWAS) as the primary method of wind shear detection at major U.S. airports. With the upcoming deployment of the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) system, potential methods for integrating the two systems are being investigated...

READ MORE

Gust front detection algorithm for the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar : part 1, current status

Published in:
Proc. Third Int. Conf. on the Aviation Weather System, 30 January - 3 February 1989, pp. 31-34.

Summary

The gust front detection and wind shift algorithm is one of the two main algorithms developed for the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) program. This two-part paper documents some recent enhancements to, and the current status of, the algorithm (Part 1) and presents some results from recent testing of the algorithm during the TDWR Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) (Part 2: Klingle-Wilson et al., 1989).
READ LESS

Summary

The gust front detection and wind shift algorithm is one of the two main algorithms developed for the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) program. This two-part paper documents some recent enhancements to, and the current status of, the algorithm (Part 1) and presents some results from recent testing of the...

READ MORE

The FAA Terminal Doppler Weather (TDWR) Program

Published in:
Proc. Third Int. Conf. on the Aviation Weather Systems, 30 January - 3 February 1989, pp. 414-419.

Summary

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) initiated the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) program in the mid-1980s in response to overwhelming scientific evidence that low-altitude wind shear had caused a number of major air-carrier accidents. The program is designed to develop a reliable automated system for detecting low-altitude wind shear in the terminal area and providing warnings that will help pilots successfully avoid it on approach and departure. Wind shear has caused more U.S. air-carrier fatalities than any other weather hazard. A 1983 National Research Council (NRC) study (National Research Council, 1983) identified low-altitude wind shear as the cause of 27 aircraft accidents and incidents between 1964 and 1982. A total of 488 people died in seven of these accidents, 112 of them in the 1975 crash of Eastern Flight 66 at New York and 153 in the crash of Pan American Flight 759 at New Orleans in 1982. Since the NRC study was completed, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has investigated at least three more wind-shear incidents. One of these, the crash of Delta Flight 191 at Dallas/Fort Worth on August 2, 1985, took another 137 lives. Wind shear is not a serious hazard for aircraft enroute between airports at normal cruising altitudes, but low-level wind shear in the terminal area can be deadly for an aircraft on approach or departure. The most hazardous form of wind shear is the microburst, an outflow of air from a small-scale but powerful downward gush of cold, heavy air that can occur beneath a thunderstorm or rain shower or even in rain-free air under a harmless-looking cumulus cloud. As this downdraft reaches the earth's surface, it spreads out horizontally, like a stream of water sprayed straight down on a concrete driveway from a garden hose. An aircraft that flies through a microburst at low altitude first encounters a strong headwind, then a downdraft, and finally a tailwind that produces a sharp reduction in airspeed and a sudden loss of lift. This deadly sequence of events caused the fatal crash at Dallas/Fort Worth in 1985, as well as a number of other serious air-carrier accidents. Wind shear can also be associated with gust fronts, warm and cold fronts, and strong winds near the ground. It is important for pilots to be trained in recovery techniques to use if they are caught in wind shear. But a sudden windspeed change of at least 40 to 50 knots, which is not uncommon in microbursts, presents a serious hazard to jet airliners, and some microbursts simply are non-survivable. The only sure way to survive wind shear in the terminal area is to avoid it. However, flight crews do not have adequate information available today to predict or detect wind shear. The primary goal of the IDWR program is to provide pilots with an objective, quantitative assessment of the wind-shear hazard. The TDWR system also will improve operational efficiency and reduce delays in the terminal area by providing air traffic control supervisors with timely warnings of impending wind shifts resulting from gust fronts.
READ LESS

Summary

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) initiated the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) program in the mid-1980s in response to overwhelming scientific evidence that low-altitude wind shear had caused a number of major air-carrier accidents. The program is designed to develop a reliable automated system for detecting low-altitude wind shear in...

READ MORE

Automated tracking for aircraft surveillance radar systems

Published in:
IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., Vol. AES-15, No. 4, July 1979, pp. 508-517.

Summary

An improved moving target detector (MTD) (a digital signal processor) has been designed, constructed, and tested which successfully rejects all forms of radar clutter while providing reliable detection of all aircraft within the coverage of the radar. The MTD is being tested on both terminal and enroute surveillance radars for the FAA. This processor has been integrated with automatic tracking algorithms to give complete rejection of ground clutter, heavy precipitation, and angels (birds).
READ LESS

Summary

An improved moving target detector (MTD) (a digital signal processor) has been designed, constructed, and tested which successfully rejects all forms of radar clutter while providing reliable detection of all aircraft within the coverage of the radar. The MTD is being tested on both terminal and enroute surveillance radars for...

READ MORE

Description and performance evaluation of the moving target detector

Published in:
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Report ATC-69

Summary

Under FAA sponsorship, MIT, Lincoln Laboratory has developed new techniques which significantly enhance automated aircraft detection in all forms of clutter. These techniques are embodied in a digital signal processor called the Moving Target Detector (MTD). This processor has been integrated into the ARTS-III system at the National Aviation Facilities Experimental Center, Atlantic City, New Jersey (NAFEC) and has undergone testing during the summer of 1975. This report contains a description of the MTD design and its evaluation tests. A detailed discussion of the significance of the results is also presented. The detection performance of the MTD was excellent in the clear, in rain and ground clutter, and false alarms were under complete control. The MTD processed range and azimuth data was very accurate, and the MTJI did not suffer from track dropouts as did the conventional MTI when the aircraft track became tangential to the radar. Performance was excellent on magnetron as well as klystron-type radars with the exception- of second-time-around clutter cancellation.
READ LESS

Summary

Under FAA sponsorship, MIT, Lincoln Laboratory has developed new techniques which significantly enhance automated aircraft detection in all forms of clutter. These techniques are embodied in a digital signal processor called the Moving Target Detector (MTD). This processor has been integrated into the ARTS-III system at the National Aviation Facilities...

READ MORE

The PMP, a programmable radar signal processor

Author:
Published in:
Monthly Mtg. of Boston IEEE, Mitre Corp, Bedford, Ma 13 October 1976.

Summary

During the last few years, the Radar Techniques Group at Lincoln Laboratory has been applying digital processing techniques to the problem of automatic detection of moving vehicles in the presence of ground and weather clutter. An outgrowth of this effort is the development of a real-time radar signal processor, the Parallel Microprogrammable Processor, or PMP. Conceptually the PMP consists of a single control unit and an array of identical processing modules. The control unit sequences through a program stored in its control memory, providing identical instructions to each processing module, so that all modules are performing the same operation in parallel, each on its own set of data. The talk will focus on the motivation for, and advantages of such a parallel architecture, as presently implemented with TTL medium-scale integrated circuits. Some examples of parallel computation will be illustrated as well as more general issues relating to programmability of the PMP. Much of the information in the talk will be based on experience with an operational prototype, which has a control unit and one processor module.
READ LESS

Summary

During the last few years, the Radar Techniques Group at Lincoln Laboratory has been applying digital processing techniques to the problem of automatic detection of moving vehicles in the presence of ground and weather clutter. An outgrowth of this effort is the development of a real-time radar signal processor, the...

READ MORE