Publications

As part of a broader FAA program to improve supportability, the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) radar data acquisition (RDA) subsystem is being replaced. For this purpose we developed an engineering prototype RDA with a scalable, open-systems hardware platform. This paper describes the design and characteristics of this new system. The dramatically increased computing power and more flexible transmitter control also enables modern signal processing algorithms to be implemented to improve the quality of the base data. Results highlighting the improved range-overlay protection provided by the new algorithms are presented.

This paper is a concept study for possible future utilization of active electronically scanned radars to provide weather and aircraft surveillance functions in U.S. airspace. If critical technology costs decrease sufficiently, multi-function phased array radars might prove to be a cost effective alternative to current surveillance radars, since the number of required radars would be reduced, and maintenance and logistics infrastructure would be consolidated. A radar configuration that provides terminal-area and long-range aircraft surveillance and weather measurement capability is described and a radar network design that replicates or exceeds current airspace coverage is presented. Key technology issues are examined, including transmit-receive elements, overlapped sub-arrays, the digital beamformer, and weather and aircraft post-processing algorithms. We conclude by discussing implications relative to future national weather and non-cooperative aircraft target surveillance needs. The U.S. Government currently operates four separate ground based surveillance radar networks supporting public and aviation-specific weather warnings and advisories, and primary or "skin paint" aircraft surveillance. The separate networks are: (i) The 10-cm wavelength NEXRAD or WSR88-D (Serafin and Wilson, 2000) national-scale weather radar network. This is managed jointly by the National Weather Service (NWS), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and the Department of Defense (DoD). (ii) The 5-cm wavelength Terminal Doppler Weather Radars (TDWR) (Evans and Turnbull, 1989) deployed at large airports to detect low-altitude wind-shear phenomena. (iii) The 10-cm wavelength Airport Surveillance Radars (ASR-9 and ASR-11) (Taylor and Brunins, 1985) providing terminal area primary aircraft surveillance and vertically averaged precipitation reflectivity measurements. (iv) The 30-cm wavelength Air Route Surveillance Radars (ARSR-1, 2, 3 and 4) (Weber, 2005) that provide national-scale primary aircraft surveillance. The latter three networks are managed primarily by the FAA, although the DoD operates a limited number of ASRs and has partial responsibility for maintenance of the ARSR network. In total there are 513 of these radars in the contiguous United States (CONUS), Alaska, and Hawaii. The agencies that maintain these radars conduct various "life extension" activities that are projected to extend their operational life to approximately 2020. At this time, there are no defined programs to acquire replacement radars. The NWS and FAA have recently begun exploratory research on the capabilities and technology issues related to the use of multi-function phased array radar (MPAR) as a possible replacement approach. A key concept is that the MPAR network could provide both weather and primary aircraft surveillance, thereby reducing the total number of ground-based radars. In addition, MPAR surveillance capabilities would likely exceed those of current operational radars, for example, by providing more frequent weather volume scans and by providing vertical resolution and height estimates for primary aircraft targets. Table 1 summarizes the capabilities of current U.S. surveillance radars. These are approximations and do not fully capture variations in capability as a function, for example, of range or operating mode. A key observation is that significant variation in update rates between the aircraft and weather surveillance functions are currently achieved by using fundamentally different antenna patterns--low-gain vertical "fan beams" for aircraft surveillance that are scanned in azimuth only, versus high-gain weather radar "pencil beams" that are scanned volumetrically at much lower update rates. Note also that, if expressed in consistent units, the power-aperture products of the weather radars significantly exceed those of the ASRs and ARSRs. In the next section, we present a concept design for MPAR and demonstrate that it can simultaneously provide the measurement capabilities summarized in Table 1. In Section 3 we present an MPAR network concept that duplicates the airspace coverage provided by the current multiple radar networks. Section 4 discusses technology issues and associated cost considerations. We conclude in Section 5 by discussing implications relative to future national weather and non-cooperative aircraft target surveillance needs.

Multiple pulse-repetition interval (multi-PRI) transmission is part of an adaptive signal transmission and processing algorithm being developed to combat range-velocity (RV) ambiguity for the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR). In Part I of this two-part paper, an adaptive clutter filtering procedure that yields low biases in the moments estimates was presented. In this part, algorithms for simultaneously providing range-overlay protection and velocity dealiasing using multi-PRI signal transmission and processing are presented. The effectiveness of the multi-PRI RV ambiguity mitigation scheme is demonstrated using simulated and real weather radar data, with excellent results. Combined with the adaptive clutter filter, this technique will be used within the larger context of an adaptive signal transmission and processing scheme in which phase-code processing will be a complementary alternative.

This paper investigates methods for quantifying aviation convective weather delay reduction benefits for nowcasts and short term forecasts.

Multiple pulse repetition interval (multi-PRI) transmission is part of an adaptive signal transmission and processing algorithm being developed to aggressively combat range-velocity ambiguity in weather radars. In the past, operational use of multi-PRI pulse trains has been hampered due to the difficulty in clutter filtering. This paper presents finite impulse response clutter filter designs for multi-PRI signals with excellent magnitude and phase responses. These filters provide strong suppression for use on low-elevation scans and yield low biases of velocity estimates so that accurate velocity dealiasing is possible. Specifically, the filters are designed for use in the Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) and are shown to meet base data bias requirements equivalent to the Federal Aviation Administration's specifications for the current TDWR clutter filters. Also an adaptive filter selection algorithm is proposed that bases its decision on clutter power estimated during an initial long-PRI surveillance scan. Simulations show that this adaptive algorithm yields satisfactory biases for reflectivity, velocity, and spectral width. Implementation of such a scheme would enable automatic elimination of anomalous propagation signals and constant adjustment to evolving ground clutter conditions, an improvement over the current TDWR clutter filtering system.

The Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) radar data acquisition (RDA) subsystem is being replaced as part of a broader FAA program to improve the supportability of the system. An engineering prototype RDA has been developed with a scalable, open-systems hardware platform. With the dramatically increased computing power and more flexible transmitter control, modern signal processing algorithms can be implemented to improve the quality of the base data. Nation-wide, the most serious data quality challenge is range-velocity (RV) ambiguity. In a previous study (Cho et al., 2003) we showed that multiple pulse repetition interval (PRI) and constant-PRI phase-code processing have complementary strengths with respect to range-fold protection, and pro-posed an adaptive waveform and processing selection scheme on a radial-by-radial basis. Here we describe the scheme and give more details about the clutter filtering and velocity dealiasing algorithms to be used on the two types of signals.

Weather continues to be a significant source of delay for aircraft destined to and departing from the New York metropolitan area, with weather delays through the first half of 2004 reaching levels not seen since 2000. In Allan et al. (2001), it was shown that total arrival delays on days with low ceiling and visibility at Newark Airport (EWR) averaged 210 hours, increasing to an average of 280 hours on days with thunderstorms impacting EWR operations. An analysis of Ground Delay Programs (GDPs) due to weather in the National Airspace System was performed for 2002-20031. Low ceilings, thunderstorms, snow, and wind were all shown to be significant sources of delay (Figure 1). These same weather conditions that lead to GDPs often also lead to holding and long departure delays. In 1998, demonstration of a prototype Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS) began in the New York area, helping significantly reduce terminal delays from convection, high surface winds, and vertical wind shear (Allan et al., 2001). In 2002, a new demonstration system, the Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS), was introduced at New York Center (ZNY) to help mitigate convective weather delays in the enroute airspace. Substantial benefits were realized from this system and are documented in Robinson et al. (2004). While systems such as ITWS and CIWS have helped significantly with convective weather, much has been learned during the field-testing of these systems about areas where existing research and technology could be leveraged to reduce weather delay in areas that have not been addressed previously. This paper will discuss four experimental products that recently have been or will be fielded in the NY area and how they are expected to benefit the aviation system. Enhancements to the Terminal Convective Weather Forecast (TCWF) address delays in convective weather, snowstorms, and steady rain. The newly fielded Route Availability Planning Tool (RAPT) addresses departure delays in convective weather. The Ceiling and Visibility (C&V) Diagnosis and Prediction Product will address delay due to low ceiling and visibility. The Path-Based Shear Detection (PSD) tool is expected to help both to reduce delays on days with high winds and to indicate regions of potential low altitude turbulence.

Reducing thunderstorm-related air traffic delays in congested airspace has become a major objective of the FAA, especially given the recent growth in convective delays. In 2000 and 2001, the key new initiative for reducing these convective weather delays was "strategic" traffic flow management (TFM). Users were given 2-, 4-, and 6-hour collaborative convective weather forecasts, and collaborative traffic routing plans were established via telecons attended by Air Traffic Control (ATC) and airline traffic managers. This "strategic" approach led to difficulties during a large fraction of the weather events because it was not possible to generate forecasts of convective weather at time horizons between 2 and 6 hours that were accurate enough to assess impacts on routes and capacity, and thereby accomplish effective TFM. During convective weather events, traffic managers tend to focus on tactical TFM [Huberdeau, 2004], yet they had relatively inaccurate current weather information and tactical forecasts. The Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS) demonstration began in 2001. The objectives of the demonstration are to provide improved tactical air traffic management (ATM) decision support, via improved real time 3D products and accurate short-term convective weather forecasts, and to determine if this support is an operationally useful complement to "strategic" TFM. The current focus of the CIWS initiative is the highly congested airspace containing the Great Lakes and Northeast corridors, since that region offers the greatest potential for delay reduction benefits. In this paper, we describe the current status of CIWS, including initial operational results of Air Traffic Control (ATC) and airline use of the CIWS weather products. We begin with some CIWS background, describing the motivation for the program, the role of CIWS products in the overall convective weather planning process, and the functional domains in which CIWS products can provide operationally significant benefits. We then review the current CIWS capabilities, spatial coverage, sensors used, products, operational users, and integration with ATM systems. Next the detailed CIWS operational benefits study carried out in 2003 is summarized. Finally, we discuss the FAA plans for CIWS and near term enhancements to the system.

In this paper, we summarize contemporary approaches to quantifying convective weather delay reduction benefits. We outline a program to develop a significantly improved capability that can be used to assess benefits of specific systems. This program may potentially accomplish weather impact normalization for studies of National Airspace System (NAS) performance in handling convective weather. Benefits quantification and NAS performance assessment have become very important topics for the aviation weather community. In an era of significant federal government and airline budget austerity for civil aviation investments, it is essential to quantitatively demonstrate delay reduction benefits of improved weather decision support systems. Major FAA initiatives stress the importance of quantitative system performance metrics that are related to aviation weather. For example, the new FAA Air Traffic Organization (ATO) and the FAA Flight Plan 2004-08 both have quantitative performance metrics that are closely related to reducing convective weather delays. The Flight Plan metrics include: "Improving the percentage of all flights arriving within 15 minutes of schedule at the 35 OEP airports by 7%, as measured from the FY2000-02 baseline, through FY08," and "Maintaining average en route travel times among the eight major metropolitan areas." The ATO metrics include the percentage of on time gate arrivals and the fraction of departures that are delayed greater than 40 minutes. However, these metrics currently do not account for the differences in convective weather severity and changes in the NAS. The dramatic increase in convective season delays in 2004 (Figure 1) due to a combination of severe weather, increases in overall demand, and specific airport issues has demonstrated that one needs to consider these other factors. Approaches to delay reduction quantification that were viewed as successful and valid several years ago are no longer considered to be adequate by either by the FAA investment analysis branch or by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The paper proceeds as follows. We first discuss at some length the mechanisms by which convective weather delay occurs in the NAS and highlight challenges in delay reduction assessment. We consider this to be very important since one needs to understand how the system operates if one is to design an effective, accurate performance assessment system. We then consider benefits quantification based on feedback from experienced users of a system. Feedback on "average" benefits from a system at the end of a test period was used to generate delay reduction estimates for the Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS) and the Weather and Radar Processor (WARP). This end-of-season interview approach was not viable in highly congested en route airspace. Hence, a new approach was developed for Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS) benefits assessment that uses real time observations of product usage during convective weather events coupled with in depth analysis of specific cases. Next, we discuss the problems that arise when one attempts to quantify delay reduction benefits by comparing flight delays before and after the Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS) system was deployed at Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport (ATL). This seemingly simple approach has proven very difficult in practice because the convective weather events in the different time periods are virtually never identical and because other aspects of the NAS may also have changed (e.g., user demand, fleet mix, and other systems that impact convective weather delays). It has become clear that one needs a quantitative model for the NAS that would permit adjustment of measured delay data to account at least for the differences in convective weather and changes in user demand (i.e., flight scheduling). The paper concludes with recommendations for measuring near term benefits of various classes of convective weather decision support systems.

Major airlines and FAA Traffic Flow Managers alike would prefer to plan their flight routes around convective weather and thereby avoid the tactical maneuvering that results when unforecasted thunderstorms occur. Strategic planning takes place daily and 2-6 hr forecasts are utilized, but these early plans remain unaltered in only the most predictable of convective weather scenarios. More typically, the ATC System Command Center and the Air Route Traffic Control Centers together with airline dispatchers will help flights to utilize jet routes that remain available within regions of convection, or facilitate major reroutes around convection, according to the available "playbook" routes. For this tactical routing in the presence of convective weather to work, both a precise and timely shared picture of current weather is required as well as an accurate, reliable short term (0-2 hr) forecast. This is crucial to containing the system-wide and airport-specific delays that are so prevalent in the summer months (Figure 1), especially as traffic demands approach full capacity at the pacing airports. This paper describes the Tactical 0-2 hr Convective Weather Forecast (CWF) algorithm developed by the MIT Lincoln Laboratory for the FAA, principally sponsored by the Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP). This CWF technology is currently being utilized in both the Integrated Terminal Weather System (ITWS; Wolfson et al., 2004) and the Corridor Integrated Weather System (CIWS; Evans et al., 2004) proof-of-concept demonstrations. Some of this technology is also being utilized in the National Convective Weather Forecast from the Aviation Weather Center (Megenhardt, 2004), the NCAR Autonowcaster (Saxen et al., 2004), and in various private-vendor forecast systems.